Sometimes possibilities open with the correct confluence of languages.
I have been following with interest the recent (and ancient) thread on interdisciplinarity. I am intrigued by not only bridges but the building blocks of bridges.
I wonder if, at a sufficiently abstract level, some of those blocks may exist in the practice of markup. Markup aims to create a structured object.
Historically, we have come to a point where languages that express such a structured object can also be used to transform the structured object. Given the wise practice of documenting the decisions that lead to the creation of the structured object, in a sense a metalanguage is available to serve as a bridge between disciplines and further conversations about objects and their transformations.
In this light, one might consider the Text Encoding Initiative as a multidisciplinary project.
Notice I have avoided the mention of “method” in favour of “practice”.
This little message to Humanist seems terse but what an abyss lurks in the distance between method and practice.
And so for day 2070